Plu Extremi Konditio Skience Nota, Numera Papira 1

U INTEGRA DU SKEMA – PLU IDEA, DE TRI SKEMA

ex Walter G. Green III

Kopireit 2002 ex Walter G. Green III.  Panto plu privilegi pa salva.  Plu universita profesi-pe, recerka-pe, e stude-pe posi reproduce plu kopi; pro plu sko uti; e u kopi pro persona uti, ka ge-volu. 

U INTRA-DUCE:

(1)   Plu urge reakti skema, in un United States, es de plu tri kategori; ge-defini iso: (a) u funktio klasi; (b) u mini-ra; (c) u metri; (d) u aplika, a u specifi acide; (e) kron pa fini; e (f) u bio-longi.  U tabla 1 kompara plu-ci kriterio, per u singu skema speci. 

Tabla 1.  Plu Karakteri Skema

PLU URGE FUNKTIO SKEMA:

(2)  U urge manu habe u longi mal-acide du skema histori.  Plu pre-kron du skema fo-tenta, in United States of America,  pa ge-koncentra epi plu kredi skema evolve, pro u nuki viole reakti (United States 1957, California 1959).  Plu-ci dokumenta, tem u evolve a u panto-tipo urge manu (United States 1989), pa gene plu panto risko skema, pro plu multi menace (City of Fredericksburg 1995, El Paso County 1989). 

(3)  U evolve procesa sege es u dokumenta; ge-designa skema pro plu mal-acide en u sinopsi; e pote provide u lati krati-grega reakti puta duce.  Simul u skema prepara u funktio e riskp specifi duce; tende face certa ke u krati-grega pote akti id u lega demo aegis liabili (United States 1985, 1996a).  U eskato skema idio-stori es u Federal Response Plan de 1992; u proto veri natio mal-acide skema; qi deskribe u societa e plu liabili; anti-co ne pa grafo de u specifie mal-acide.  Plu-ci es plu strategi documenta du kausa u-ci struktura e u asigna de dura fonta foku.

(4)  Plu grafo-pe pa habe kritici ambi u mekani e plu ge-produce-ra, de u urge funktio skema procesa.  U minus de adapta du skema, plu oligo participa, e u fali, ki ultra norma formati ad u ski basi mode, pa habe ge-sugesti ka plu multi urge funktio skema defici.  Anti-co u konsensus es; ke u deko designa skema es u gravi krati-grega prepara procesa debi; e ke mu pote habe u gravi mal-cide sege efekti (Katez 1988).    

PLU PRE-SKEMA:

(5)  U maxi basi urge acide pre-skema mode es u evolve e u distribu, de plu carta bibli.  Plu-ci bibli es ge-uti ex urge reakti grega; trovi u acide topo (Davis, 1985).  U sege superio skema klasi es u bali-karta, u ur-papira karta (Cotreau 1994, Ditzel 1990), e nu u puta-me auxi emisi sistema.  U bali-karta provide u norma urge vagona asigna, pro gravi kuminita loka.   

(6)  Ad u ma avanti mode, u multi-domi pre-skema prepara: u dura-fonta asigna; u mini-ra multi-domi info; plu multi-domi risko; e acesi skema.  Plu grafo-pe forti kura; ke u pre-skema ne debi sugesti domi acide taktiki, kausa plu lati posi acide konditio varia (Klaene e Sanders 2000).  Plu cetera sugesti u ma taktiki focu skema, kon u asigna duce e sugesti akti seri (Jenaway 1986).

PLU ACIDE AKTI SKEMA:

(7)  U acide akti skema es u acide komanda sistema ge-produce-ra; du feno iso mero, de plu proto FIRESCOPE e Natio Multi-departimenta Acide Manu Sistema literatura (United States 1983, 1987).  Plu skema es plu grafo dokumenta, in plu maxi boni no-dama-landa acide komanda sistema util; pa fini du uti plu norma papira-forma seri (Carlson 1983).  U skema ge-produce ex u du skema generali grega, tem u ge-establi funktio tem lista.  U singu acide akti skema establi plu kontrola buta-ra; e asigna plu dura fonta a specifi funktio tem buta.  Mu ma-mega u iso-tem-komuni funktio fortuna; dokumenta u tende; e es u acide funktio buta teluto ge-grafo acorda (Perry 1987).

(8)  Plu grafo acide akti skema es rari, in plu efemera urba acide acide komanda sistema.  U tende es afirma; ke plu acide akti skema pote es plu oral skema, pro plu maxi acide (National Fire Service Incident Management Consortium 1993, United States 1996b); alo ne grafo de plu acide akti du skema (Coleman 1997).

PLU SKEMA RELATI:

(9)  Ne es relati plu skema ge-preduce-ra, in reali uti.  Plu pre-skema ge-prepara in plu relativi brevi tem acide kontextu; qi ne kausa u grafo acide akti skema evolve.  Plu pre-skema posi influ u orali acide akti skema.  Ne es u nexu volu, inter pre-skema e urge funktio skema; klu si u pre-skema loka reakti es u mal-acide reakti.  U pre-skema fo-puta, iso u loka refere lami, feno profilakti u kopula.  U maxi probabili efekti es; ke panto ge-expekta pre-skema dura fonta ne es existe, pro heretero akti. 

(10)  Id es questio; si acide akti skema frege influ urge funktio skema.  U skruti, pro mo mega mal-acide, ne demonstra plu krati-grega urge funktio skema refere.  Plu kontrola buta-ra pa es equivalu, kon plu urge funktio skema akti; sed ne pa es u evide indika; ke u urge funktio skema strategi pa es fini (Franklin City e Southampton County Flood Task Force 1999).  Si es veri, kon u grafo acide akti skema; id es probabili; la es klu mei plu orali skema integra.

(11)  Plu urge du skema ge-produce-ra ge-evolve ex tri autori: plu urge manu-pe pro urge funktio skema; plu anti-piro departimenta ergo-pe pro pre-skema; e u acide komanda generali ergo-pe pro plu acide acti skema.  U singu dokumenta ge-prepara tem u difere horo - u acide akti skema ge-prepara sub u progressi urge acide presa.  U integra sub plu-ci konditio es no-facili, e no-probabili.

(12)  Qo plu responde skema debi es integra?  U responde es ja; a evolve u komunita strategi a alexi u bio e u gru.  A u elementi uti, u urge funktio skema strategi fo-puta debi info plu dura fonta eleckti; pa face in u pre-skema e  plu acide akti skema taktiki elekti.  Sed, u ma integra posi uti plu pre-skema pro plu urge funktio skema alti risko loka; e uti plu acide akti skema a ma boni u urge funktio skema duce a u specifi urge.  Tabla 2 demonstra plu-la relati.

Tabla 2.  Plu Skema Relati

BIBLIOLATRI:

California. California Disaster Office.  Civil Defense Operations Plan.  Sacramento, California, United States of America: State of California, 1959.

Carlson, Gene P., editora. Incident Command System.  Stillwater, Oklahoma, United States of America: Fire Protection Publications, 1983.

City of Fredericksburg (Virginia). Emergency Operations Plan.  Fredericksburg, Virginia, United States of America: City of Fredericksburg, 1995.

Coleman, John F.  Incident Management for the Street-Smart Fire Officer.  Saddle Brook, New Jersey, United States of America: PennWell Publishing Company, 1997.

Cotreau, Mark. “Preplanning Your Response: It’s In The Cards.”  Fire Engineering.  1994 meno-bi.  pp. 49-50.

Davis, Larry.  Rural Firefighting Operations.  Ashland, Massachusetts, United States of America: International Society of Fire Service Instructors, 1985.

Ditzel, Paul.  Fire Alarm! The Fascinating Story Behind The Red Box On The Corner.  New Albany, Indiana, United States of America: Fire Buff House Publishers, 1990.

El Paso County (Colorado). Disaster Services.  El Paso County Disaster Operations Plan.  Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States of America: El Paso County, 1989.

Franklin City e Southampton County Flood Task Force.  9/19/99 Day Shift Incident Action Plan.  Franklin, Virginia, United States of America: City of Franklin, 1999.

Franklin City e Southampton County Flood Task Force.  Incident Action Plan, Night Shift 9/19-20/99.  Franklin, Virginia, United States of America: City of Franklin, 1999.

Franklin City e Southampton County Flood Task Force.  Incident Action Plan for The Monday 0800 to 1800 Hr Shift.  Franklin, Virginia, United States of America: City of Franklin, 1999.

Franklin City e Southampton County Flood Task Force.  Incident Action Plan for Tuesday September 21, 1999.  Franklin, Virginia, United States of America: City of Franklin, 1999.

Jenaway, William E.  Pre-Emergency Planning.  Ashland, Massachusetts, United States of America: International Society of Fire Service Instructors, 1986.

Karetz, Jack D.  “Emergency Planning: An Adaptive Approach.”  Baseline Data Report.  1988 meno seti/meno okto.

Klaene, Ben e Russ Sanders. “Pre-Incident Planning of Tactical Operations.”  NFPA Journal.  2000 meno mo-mo/meno mo-bi.  pp. 20 e 98.

National Fire Service Incident Management System Consortium. Model Procedures Committee.  Model Procedures Guide for Structural Firefighting.  Stillwater, Oklahoma, United States of America: Fire Protection Publications, 1993.

Perry, Donald G.  Wildland Firefighting: Fire Behavior, Tactics & Command.  Bellflower, California, United States of America: Fire publications, Inc., 1987.

United States. Federal Civil Defense Administration.  Battleground U.S.A.: An Operations Plan for the Civil Defense of a Metropolitan Target Area.  Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America: U. S. Government Printing Office, 1957.

United States. Department of Agriculture. Boise Interagency Fire Center.  National Interagency Incident Management System.  Boise, Idaho, United States of America: Boise Interagency Fire Center. 1983.

United States. Federal Emergency Management Agency.  Guide for Development of State and Local Emergency Operations Plans.  Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America: U. S. Government Printing Office, 1985.

United States. Federal Emergency Management Agency.  Exemplary Practices in Emergency Management: The California FIRESCOPE Program.  Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America: U. S. Government Printing Office, 1987.

United States. Federal Emergency Management Agency.  The Emergency Program Manager. HS-1.  Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America: U. S. Government Printing Office, 1989.

United States. Federal Emergency Management Agency.  The Federal Response Plan (For Public Law 93-288, As Amended).  Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America: U. S. Government Printing Office, 1992.

United States. Federal Emergency Management Agency.  Guide for All-Hazard Emergency Operations Planning.  Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America: U. S. Government Printing Office, 1996.

United States. Federal Emergency Management Agency. United States Fire Administration. Incident Command System for Emergency Medical Services.  Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America: U. S. Government Printing Office, 1996.